[twitter]Something sad is happening to the content on the web; the conversation is getting fractured. It’s floating by so quickly, it’s impossible to gather and aggregate.
When a link is shared on Twitter or Facebook, the audience is responding to the tweet or the status, not the actual content.
Often the conversation that happens after the content is more valuable than the content itself. A news story on a media site will have great debates in the threaded comments below the story to add fuel to the fire and food for though. Imagine now if all those comments were only on the Facebook page. Imagine you read the story about allegations against a politician or a controversial medical decision and there is no debate afterwards. The content is locked down, the conversation tossed to the winds of Facebook.
Facebook‘s content isn’t entirely searchable. The conversations that happen there, while valuable, aren’t being archived along with the content that sparks the conversations.
One of the hurdles tossed up comes from the content creators themselves. Concerned about spam and abusive comments they often toss up hurdles to the commenting process, in essence forcing the conversation out.
There are some blog plugins that will let you use your Facebook account to comment on a blog and link your comment on the blog and your wall, but you have to comment at the source first, not Facebook first – which is now the default behaviour of many.
Do me a favour? The next time you see something great on Facebook or Twitter, pass it along, share it or retweet it with a small reactionary message, but donate the bulk of your thoughts to the actual content. Cling your comment to the content so the conversation can continue at the source.
catch the buzz … pass it on.